Rapport sur les tailles des équipements de cricket et de hockey

Quelles marques proposent réellement des tailles petites ou grandes, si l'on se base sur les retours clients réels plutôt que sur des opinions ?

Dernière mise à jour

Across 1370 size-related returns covering 17 brands, 8 brands run consistently small and 2 brands run consistently large. The remaining 7 brands show no reliable bias either way.

Biais de taille par marque, classés par taille d'échantillon
Marque Comment ça s'adapte Trop petit Trop grand Analyse des rendements
Adidas Tends to run small 64% 36% 417
Gray-Nicolls Tends to run small 70% 30% 171
Kookaburra Mixed - no clear lean 46% 54% 159
Gunn & Moore Tends to run small 63% 37% 90
Asics Tends to run small 64% 36% 88
Grays Tends to run small 81% 19% 64
New Balance Mixed - no clear lean 63% 38% 56
Osaka Mixed - no clear lean 38% 62% 50
Nike Tends to run large 31% 69% 45
Masuri Tends to run small 80% 20% 40
Shrey Tends to run small 68% 33% 40
OBO Mixed - no clear lean 38% 62% 34
Castore Tends to run small 69% 31% 29
Mizuno Mixed - no clear lean 36% 64% 25
Y1 Hockey Mixed - no clear lean 33% 67% 24
DSC Mixed - no clear lean 55% 45% 20
Hunts County Tends to run large 22% 78% 18

Ce que disent les données, marque par marque

  • Adidas Adidas tends to run small: 64% of the 417 size-related returns we recorded for it were because the item was too small.
  • Gray-Nicolls Gray-Nicolls tends to run small: 70% of the 171 size-related returns we recorded for it were because the item was too small.
  • Kookaburra Kookaburra shows no consistent sizing bias: of 159 size-related returns, 46% were too small and 54% too big.
  • Gunn & Moore Gunn & Moore tends to run small: 63% of the 90 size-related returns we recorded for it were because the item was too small.
  • Asics Asics tends to run small: 64% of the 88 size-related returns we recorded for it were because the item was too small.
  • Grays Grays tends to run small: 81% of the 64 size-related returns we recorded for it were because the item was too small.
  • New Balance New Balance shows no consistent sizing bias: of 56 size-related returns, 63% were too small and 38% too big.
  • Osaka Osaka shows no consistent sizing bias: of 50 size-related returns, 38% were too small and 62% too big.
  • Nike Nike tends to run large: 69% of the 45 size-related returns we recorded for it were because the item was too big.
  • Masuri Masuri tends to run small: 80% of the 40 size-related returns we recorded for it were because the item was too small.
  • Shrey Shrey tends to run small: 68% of the 40 size-related returns we recorded for it were because the item was too small.
  • OBO OBO shows no consistent sizing bias: of 34 size-related returns, 38% were too small and 62% too big.
  • Castore Castore tends to run small: 69% of the 29 size-related returns we recorded for it were because the item was too small.
  • Mizuno Mizuno shows no consistent sizing bias: of 25 size-related returns, 36% were too small and 64% too big.
  • Y1 Hockey Y1 Hockey shows no consistent sizing bias: of 24 size-related returns, 33% were too small and 67% too big.
  • DSC DSC shows no consistent sizing bias: of 20 size-related returns, 55% were too small and 45% too big.
  • Hunts County Hunts County tends to run large: 78% of the 18 size-related returns we recorded for it were because the item was too big.

Comment cela est-il mesuré ?

Chaque chiffre provient de nos propres retours. Lorsqu'un client retourne un article, il nous indique le motif. Si le retour concerne la taille, nous enregistrons si l'article était trop petit ou trop grand. Ce rapport ne comptabilise que les retours liés à la taille, et reflète donc les problèmes d'ajustement plutôt que les défauts, les changements d'avis ou les problèmes de livraison.

Elle couvre actuellement les déclarations enregistrées entre et .

Une marque n'est considérée comme ayant une faible ou une forte présence que si la tendance est statistiquement fiable : nous exigeons que la limite inférieure de l'intervalle de confiance à 95 % de la tendance dominante reste supérieure à la moitié. Par conséquent, un résultat déséquilibré issu d'un petit nombre de déclarations est considéré comme mitigé et non comme une tendance. Les marques doivent présenter au moins 15 déclarations directionnelles pour apparaître dans les résultats, et les produits individuels au moins 8. Les chiffres sont mis à jour automatiquement à mesure que de nouvelles déclarations sont reçues.

Ces chiffres peuvent être cités ou mentionnés en mentionnant la source. Cricket-Hockey.com.

GB
It looks like you're visiting from United Kingdom

Prices will include local taxes where applicable.